Pennsylvania University. US: Results of Phase III Clinical Study of Advanced Kidney Cancer Patients after Surgery Revealed No Survival Benefit for Sunitinib, Sorafenib.
 
Two widely used targeted therapy drugs— approved by the FDA for  use in 
metastatic kidney cancer —are no more effective than a placebo in  
preventing return of the disease to increase life spans of patients 
suffering  from advanced kidney cancer after surgery, according to new 
results to be  presented by a researcher at the University of 
Pennsylvania’s Abramson Cancer Center (ACC)  during the 2015 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. 
Lead researcher Naomi B.  Haas, MD, associate
 professor in the Division of Hematology/Oncology and  director of the 
Prostate and Kidney Cancer Program at the ACC, and her  colleagues in 
the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (ECOG-ACRIN) treated 1,943  
patients in the United States and Canada with one year of sorafenib, 
sunitinib,  or a placebo drug after surgery to resect (cut out) their 
kidney tumors. The  phase III study found no difference in median years 
of disease-free survival in  the adjuvant setting: 5.6 years for 
sunitinib; 5.6 years for sorafenib; and 5.7  years for placebos.
 The findings are one of five abstracts featured in a presscast on  
Monday, February 23 at the 2015 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, which 
is  co-sponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the 
American Society  for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Urologic 
Oncology. The Symposium  will take place February 26-28 in Orlando.
 While surgery is typically the best initial treatment for renal  
tumors, surgical resection alone is not enough to prevent return of the 
disease  in many patients. Adjuvant therapies (applied after initial 
treatment with the  goal of suppressing secondary tumor formation) are 
often needed to improve survival. 
 Sunitinib and sorafenib are examples of adjuvant therapies known  as
 kinase inhibitors. Kinases are proteins on or near the surface of 
cells;  they help cancer grow and survive. Kinase inhibitors block the 
growth of  kinases and associated blood vessels which nourish cancers. Sorafenib  and sunitinib, which are taken in pill form on a daily basis, are thought to  block different kinases. 
 Both drugs have been shown to be effective when kidney cancer has  
spread to other parts of the body. Could they also be effective in preventing recurrence of the disease?
“The current standard of care for these patients is close  
observation,” Haas said. “Unfortunately, we found that the use of 
sunitinib or  sorafenib in this setting did not reduce the incidence of 
recurrence as  compared to placebo. Fortunately, the use of these drugs 
in this setting did  not appear to make the outcome of patients 
receiving them any worse.” 
 This study,  designed and conducted by ECOG-ACRIN, is the first and 
largest trial on the  effectiveness of these two kinase inhibitors in 
patients whose kidney tumors  have been completely removed and who are 
at high risk for recurrence.  Haas said that there are other ongoing  
adjuvant trials investigating different lengths of therapy  with 
sunitinib and sorafenib, as well as different kinase inhibitors. The  
results of these investigations are not yet available and could have 
different  results than the Penn study. 
“It is important to support these trials so we learn how to better  treat kidney cancer in the adjuvant setting,” she said.
 In the early years of the trial, about a third of patients stopped  
treatment because they found the side effects, such as hypertension and 
 fatigue, of the medications too hard to tolerate.
 Patients in the study also contributed blood and urine samples as  a
 part of their participation. Analyses of these samples may shed light 
on who  might still benefit or not benefit from sunitinib and sorafenib 
in the  treatment of kidney cancer in the adjuvant setting. Haas and her
 colleagues  collected the samples at the beginning of treatment and 
subsequent to  recurrence of the cancer in patients who suffered a 
relapse—and continue to do  so more than four years after the formal 
conclusion of the study.  
“This will afford opportunities to uncover molecular clues and  other
 information that could help explain why some patients had a recurrence 
of  their cancer or a spreading elsewhere and others did not,” Haas 
said.
 ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group is a membership-based scientific  
organization that focuses on cancer research involving adults who have 
or are  at risk of developing cancer. It is comprised of nearly 1100 
member  institutions, including Penn Medicine.