RSNA: MRI screening improves early detection in women who are at average risk for breast cancer.
Researchers studied data from 2,120 women with no breast-cancer-associated risk factors who underwent supplemental MRI screening every 1 to 3 years in addition to mammography and ultrasound.
Breast MRI detected 60 additional breast cancers, including 40 invasive cancers, all of which were missed by mammography and ultrasound.
None of the cancers that arose over the total 7,007 screening rounds were found by mammography or ultrasound alone.
MRI screening improves early diagnosis of breast cancer in all
women—not only those at high risk—according to a new study from Germany
published online in the journal Radiology.
MRI has long been known as an effective breast cancer screening
modality that offers better sensitivity than mammography and ultrasound.
Currently, guidelines reserve breast MRI screening for women who have a
strong family history or other specific breast cancer risk factors. MRI
screening has not been considered necessary for women at average risk,
and there has been resistance to expansion of MRI into this population
due, in part, to concern over higher costs.
However, with breast cancer remaining a major cause of cancer death
in women, there is good reason to pursue the search for improved
screening methods, according to the study’s lead author, Christiane
Kuhl, M.D., chair of the Department of Radiology at RWTH Aachen
University in Aachen, Germany.
Between 2005 and 2013, Dr. Kuhl and colleagues studied breast MRI’s
impact on 2,120 women, ages 40 to 70, with less than a 15 percent
lifetime risk of breast cancer. The women had normal screening
mammograms and, in the case of those with dense breast tissue, normal
screening ultrasound. Breast MRI detected 60 additional breast cancers,
including 40 invasive cancers, for an overall supplemental cancer
detection rate of 15.5 per 1,000 women. Of the 60 cancers detected in
the study group over the observation period (7,007 screening rounds), 59
were found only using MRI, one was found also by mammography, and none
by mammography or ultrasound alone.
According to Dr. Kuhl, the results suggest that MRI can serve as a
useful supplemental screening tool for women at average risk, especially
those with dense mammographic tissue, and that MRI is superior to
supplemental ultrasound for this purpose.
The results also highlight the ability of MRI in the detection of more aggressive types of cancer.
“The faster a cancer grows and the better it is in seeding
metastases, the better will it be picked up early by MRI,” Dr. Kuhl
said. “In our cohort, cancers found by MRI alone exhibited features of
rapid growth at pathology.”
This ability is especially important in women with dense breast
tissue in which aggressive cancers may be missed on mammography. Left
undetected, these cancers will grow to become clinically palpable
cancers, also known as interval cancers. The new study showed that,
consistent with previous research, breast MRI can depict these rapidly
growing cancers with high reliability.
According to Dr. Kuhl, interval cancers exhibit an adverse biologic
profile and are the main driver of breast cancer mortality. Additional
cancers detected by MRI screening in the study had a skewed distribution
towards a higher-than-normal prevalence or incidence of rapidly growing
(grade 3) cancers.
“The interval cancer rate in our study was zero percent. Not a single
cancer was undetected that became palpable,” she said. “This suggests
that MRI finds breast cancers that also mammography would find, but MRI
detects them earlier, and it finds the cancers which, if MRI had not
been done, would have progressed to interval cancers.”