We looked for studies that enrolled adult smokers who were either in treatment or had completed treatment for substance abuse, in hospital, outpatient or community settings and randomised them to either a treatment to help them stop smoking or a control. We last searched for evidence in August 2016. We found 34 published studies. The types of smoking cessation treatment tested included: counselling (which might be a brief advice session or multiple sessions of behavioural support, either individually or in a group); medicine (called pharmacotherapy; including any type of nicotine replacement therapy, with or without other medicines that help smokers to stop smoking); or a combination of counselling and pharmacotherapy. We combined the results of trials separately for each of these types of treatment, although different trials used different treatments. People who were in the control groups received usual care, brief advice about quitting smoking, or were put on a waiting list to receive treatment later. Most trials assessed the number of people who had quit smoking at least six months after beginning treatment although we also included some studies with a shorter time.
Key results
Eleven studies with 1808 people tested the effects of various types of pharmacotherapy. There was evidence that people given pharmacotherapy were more successful at quitting smoking. Twelve studies with 2229 participants tested treatments that combined pharmacotherapy and counselling. There was evidence that people given combined treatments were more successful at quitting smoking. Eleven studies with 1759 people tested the effect of counselling compared to usual care. Combining these results did not show evidence of a benefit of counselling alone.
Eleven studies with 2231 people reported whether people remained abstinent from alcohol and other drugs. Providing tobacco cessation interventions did not make people more likely to return to using alcohol or other drugs.
We found no evidence that it made a difference whether people were given treatment to quit smoking when they were just starting treatment for other drug use or after they were in recovery. Results were also similar for people who were treated for alcohol use and for people who were treated for other drugs such as heroin.
Quality of the evidence
We judged the quality of the evidence to be low. Many studies did not give enough details about the methods that they used. The studies also considered very different types of treatment, making comparisons challenging.
Authors' conclusions:
The studies included in this review
suggest that providing tobacco cessation interventions targeted to
smokers in treatment and recovery for alcohol and other drug
dependencies increases tobacco abstinence. There was no evidence that
providing interventions for tobacco cessation affected abstinence from
alcohol and other drugs. The association between tobacco cessation
interventions and tobacco abstinence was consistent for both
pharmacotherapy and combined counselling and pharmacotherapy, for
participants both in treatment and in recovery, and for people with
alcohol dependency or other drug dependency. The evidence for the
interventions was low quality due primarily to incomplete reporting of
the risks of bias and clinical heterogeneity
in the nature of treatment. Certain results were sensitive to the
length of follow-up or the type of pharmacotherapy, suggesting that
further research is warranted regarding whether tobacco
cessation interventions are associated with tobacco abstinence for
people in recovery, and the outcomes associated with NRT versus non-NRT
or combined pharmacotherapy. Overall, the results suggest that tobacco
cessation interventions incorporating pharmacotherapy should be
incorporated into clinical practice to reduce tobacco addiction among
people in treatment for or recovery from alcohol and other drug
dependence.