Wednesday, March 25, 2015

How pharmaceutical companies can cheat about scientific research

Victoria: Pharmaceutical companies fund the bulk of clinical research, says Professor Lexchin. Perhaps not surprisingly, research has shown that company-funded research is more likely to result in positive conclusions about new therapies and products than research that is not sponsored by companies.
Drawing on real-life examples, Professor Lexchin’s lecture will investigate the possible ways in which bias can be introduced into research outcomes. This includes methods such as only publishing trials with positive results, reinterpreting data submitted to regulatory agencies, and even “ghostwriting” or hiring communications experts to write up study results under the signature of prominent academics. 
There is no evidence that any of the preventative measures that have been introduced so far have stopped this bias and it's not clear that they have even slowed down the process, says Professor Lexchin. “What is needed is a paradigm change in the way we treat the relationship between pharmaceutical companies and the conduct and reporting of clinical trials.”