Toronto: It’s a device that could transform a doctor’s ability to treat
infections: a test for antibiotic resistance that works in just one hour
– instead of several days. We live in fear of ‘superbugs’: infectious bacteria that don’t respond
to treatment by antibiotics, and can turn a routine hospital stay into a
nightmare. A 2015 Health Canada report estimates that superbugs have already cost Canadians $1 billion, and are a “serious and growing issue.” Each year two million people in the U.S. contract antibiotic-resistant infections, and at least 23,000 people die as a direct result.
But tests for antibiotic resistance can take up to three days to come
back from the lab, hindering doctors’ ability to treat bacterial
infections quickly.
Now PhD researcher Justin Besant
and his team at the University of Toronto have designed a small and
simple chip to test for antibiotic resistance in just one hour, giving
doctors a shot at picking the most effective antibiotic to treat
potentially deadly infections. Their work was published this week in the
international journal Lab on a Chip.
Resistant bacteria arise in part because of imprecise use of
antibiotics – when a patient comes down with an infection, the doctor
wants to treat it as quickly as possible. Samples of the infectious
bacteria are sent to the lab for testing, but results can take two to
three days. In the meantime, the doctor prescribes her patient a
broad-spectrum antibiotic. Sometimes the one-size-fits-all antibiotic
works and sometimes it doesn’t, and when the tests come back days later,
the doctor can prescribe a specific antibiotic more likely to kill the
bacteria.
“Guessing
can lead to resistance to these broad-spectrum antibiotics, and in the
case of serious infections, to much worse outcomes for the patient,”
says Besant, pictured at right (photo courtesy U of T Engineering). “We wanted to determine whether bacteria are susceptible to a particular antibiotic, on a timescale of hours, not days.”
The problem with most current tests is the time it takes for bacteria
to reproduce to detectable levels. Besant and his team, including his
supervisor Professor Shana Kelley of the Institute for Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering and the Faculties of Pharmacy and Medicine, and Professor Ted Sargent of
The Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical & Computer
Engineering, drew on their collective expertise in electrical and
biomedical engineering to design a chip that concentrates bacteria in a
miniscule space – just two nanolitres in volume – in order to increase
the effective concentration of the starting sample.
They achieve this high concentration by ‘flowing’ the sample,
containing the bacteria to be tested, through microfluidic wells
patterned onto a glass chip. At the bottom of each well a filter,
composed of a lattice of tiny microbeads, catches bacteria as the sample
flows through. The bacteria accumulate in the nano-sized well, where
they’re trapped with the antibiotic and a signal molecule called
resazurin.
Living bacteria metabolize resazurin into a form called resorufin,
changing its electrochemical signature. If the bacteria are effectively
killed by the antibiotic, they stop metabolizing resazurin and the
electrochemical signature in the sample stays the same. If they are
antibiotic-resistant, they continue to metabolize resazurin into
resorufin, altering its electrochemical signature. Electrodes built
directly into the chip detect the change in current as resazurin changes
to resorufin.
“This gives us two advantages,” says Besant. “One, we have a lot of
bacteria in a very small space, so our effective starting concentration
is much higher. And two, as the bacteria multiply and convert the
resazurin molecule, it’s effectively stuck in this nanolitre
droplet – it can’t diffuse away into the solution, so it can accumulate
more rapidly to detectable levels.”
“Our approach is the first to combine this method of increasing sample
concentration with a straightforward electrochemical readout,” says
Sargent. “We see this as an effective tool for faster diagnosis and
treatment of commonplace bacterial infections.”
Rapid alternatives to existing antibiotic resistance tests rely on
fluorescence detection, requiring expensive and bulky fluorescence
microscopes to see the result.
“The electronics for our electrochemical readout can easily fit in a
very small benchtop instrument, and this is something you could see in a
doctor’s office, for example,” says Besant. “The next step would be to
create a device that would allow you to test many different antibiotics
at many different concentrations, but we’re not there yet.”