Mortality: data in the dossier incomplete and not interpretable
Treatment switching occurred in all three approval studies comparing
sipuleucel-T with placebo, which were presented in the dossier by the
manufacturer: More than two thirds of the patients in the placebo group
started treatment with sipuleucel-T on progression of their disease. In
both study arms, patients received chemotherapy with docetaxel on
progression. The proportion of patients who received docetaxel and the
time point of this treatment differed, however, and the respective
information provided in the dossier was incomplete. The study results on overall survival in the dossier could therefore not be interpreted in a meaningful way: Docetaxel has a positive effect on survival. If, for example, it is given at an earlier time point in the sipuleucel-T arm than in the control arm, lower mortality cannot be explained solely by the effect of sipuleucel-T. Then there is a risk of overestimating the effect of sipuleucel-T.
Additional analyses showed advantage in mortality
The manufacturer presented further data and sensitivity analyses on
overall survival with its comment. This now led to a consistent picture
in comparison with the primary analysis of the data in the dossier:
According to this, the lower mortality in the sipuleucel-T arms cannot
be explained solely by differences in the administration of docetaxel
after progression. However, the advantages in overall survival are accompanied by negative effects in the form of side effects: Fever, headache and chills were more frequent in patients in the sipuleucel-T arm. However, these side effects were non-serious and mainly occurred only directly after the administration of sipuleucel-T. IQWiG therefore did not downgrade the positive effect regarding mortality. The conclusion of the addendum for sipuleucel-T is therefore an indication of an added benefit with the extent “non-quantifiable”.