Study characteristics
The evidence is up to date to June 2017. We found four studies that tested interventions delivered at least partly by mobile phone, which followed up participants for at least 12 months.
Key results
We were not able to combine the results of the four trials because the interventions were very different. The studies were at high risk of bias and the effects of the interventions were inconsistent across studies, and so, we are not confident about their findings. The evidence suggests that interventions delivered by mobile phone may help people to take their medication, but the benefits are small, and some trials found that the interventions did not have any beneficial effect. There was no evidence to suggest that these types of interventions caused harm. The results of trials currently being conducted should tell us the effects of these types of interventions more accurately, and will tell us if they work in a wider range of contexts, including low-income countries.
Authors' conclusions:
There is
low-quality evidence relating to the effects of mobile phone-delivered
interventions to increase adherence to medication prescribed for the
primary prevention of CVD; some trials reported small benefits while
others found no effect. There is low-quality evidence that these
interventions do not result in harm. On the basis of this review, there is currently uncertainty around the effectiveness
of these interventions. We identified six ongoing trials being
conducted in a range of contexts including low-income settings with
potential to generate more precise estimates of the effect of primary
prevention medication adherence interventions delivered by mobile phone.